Research Article

EVALUATION OF ADOPTION OF CROWDFUNDING PLATFORMS FOR REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT IN AKURE, NIGERIA

1 Department of Estate Management, Federal University of Technology, Akure
2 Department of Estate Management, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
3 Department of Estate Management, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: akuakanwaenwosu@kesj.org.ng
Published: May, 2026
Pages: 136-155
Views: 57
Downloads: 30

Abstract

Purpose: The study identified the forms of real estate crowdfunding platforms in the study Akure; evaluated the level of their adoption and examine the factors influencing the level of adoption of different forms of real estate crowdfunding in the study area.

Design/methodology/approach: In order to achieve this, forty-seven (47) questionnaires were administered to registered estate firms (35) and estate developers (12) in the study area out of which twenty-five (25) and six (6) were retrieved respectively. Overall, a total of 31 questionnaires representing 66% general response rate was achieved and found adequate for further analysis. The questionnaires were analyzed using weighted mean score analysis, relative importance index (RII) and logistic regression analysis.

Findings: The study revealed that real estate crowdfunding platforms viz reward-based crowdfunding is the most recognized with the mean of 2.48 while the hybrid model has the least familiarity with a mean-score of 2.13. The study further revealed that debt-based, donation-based and equity-based crowdfunding platforms has the highest adoption rate with a mean of (2.39) respectively, followed by reward-based crowdfunding platform with a mean of (2.32) while the hybrid model offers the lowest mean of adoption (2.13). Finally, the study found that portfolio diversification has the most valued benefit with relative importance index (RII) of 0.741935 followed by passive income generation, real estate deals and quicker dealings while professional property management, less paper work, availability of prime real estate and lower entry barrier in terms of amount of investment are less beneficial to an investor amongst other findings.

Research limitations/Implications: The rapidly evolving nature of technology platforms like crowdfunding may limit the applicability of some findings over time. The contribution to knowledge is that the study provides insight that real estate crowdfunding platforms can increase real estate investment opportunities for a broader audience contributing to financial inclusion.

Practical implications: Real estate crowdfunding platforms can be utilized by real estate developers/estate firms to diversify funding sources and thereby deepen risk sharing and diversification.

Originality/value: The study highlights strategies for promoting real estate crowdfunding platforms as a viable financing option for real estate development.

References

  1. Abdullah, A. (2016). Crowdfunding as an Emerging Crowd_Funding Tool: With Special Reference to the Malaysian Regulatory Framework. Islam and Civilisation Renewal. IAIS Malaysia. 98-119
  2. Adjakou, O. J. L. (2021). Crowdfunding: Genesis and Comprehensive Review of Its State in Africa. Open Journal of Business and Management. 9:557-585.
  3. Aderemi, A. M. R. and Ishak, M. S. I. (2020). Crowdfunding as an Alternative Mode of Financing Micro and Small Enterprises: A Proposes Qard-al-Hasan Contract. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance. 3(2):95-118.
  4. Agrawal, A., Catalini, C. and Goldfarb, A. (2011). The Geography of Crowdfunding. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1770375 (accessed August 10, 2018).
  5. Agrawal, A., Catalini, C. and Goldfarb, A. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography, Social networks and the Timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 24(2), 253-274.
  6. Ahlers, G. K. C., Cumming, D. J., Günther, C. and Schweizer, D. (2015). Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 39(4), 955-980.
  7. Anderson, B. (2016). Crowdfunding fills Construction Lending Gap left by Banks. Available at: www.nreionline.com/multifamily/crowdfunding-fills-construction-lending-gap-left-bybanks (accessed February 7, 2018).
  8. El Talla, S. A., Shobaki, M. J., Naser, S. S. and Amuna, Y. M. A. (2017). The Role of Crowdfunding in Financing Small Projects. International Journal of Advanced Educational Research. 2(1):31-37.
  9. Baldwin, A. (2017), New Developments in Real Estate Financing. Economic Affairs. 37(1):141145.
  10. Baum, A. (2015), Real Estate Investment: A Strategic Approach, Routledge, New York, NY
  11. Baum, A. (2017), "PropTech 3.0: the future of real estate", Said Business School, University of Oxford, available at: http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/6485/1/122037%20PropTech_FINAL.
  12. Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T. and Schwienbacher (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd. Journal of Business Venturing. 29(5):585-609.
  13. Berndt, A., and Mbassana, M. (2016). Crowdfunding: The Beliefs of Rwandan Entrepreneurs. East Africa Research Papers in Business, Entrepreneurship and Management. Jonkoping University. 1-18
  14. Borrero-Dominguez, C. Cordon-Lagares, E. and Hernandez-Garrido, R. (2020). Sustainability and Real Estate Crowdfunding: Success Factors. Sustainability. 12, 5136.
  15. Canon, S. E. (2014). Disruption, Disintermediation and Real Estate Crowdfunding. Real Estate Review. 43(3):1-12.
  16. Chan, D. W. and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (1997). A Comparative Study of Causes of Time Overruns in Hong Kong Construction Projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 15(1):55-63.
  17. CroowdReal Estate (2024). Crowdfunding for Real Estate. (Accessed at: [suspicious link removed]).
  18. CrowdStreet, (2024). Your Direct Access to Private Market Investing. (Accesses at: https://crowdstreet.com/resources).
  19. DiversyFund (2024). The AI-Powered Multifamily Investment Platform. (Accessed at: [suspicious link removed]).
  20. Fukuhara, M. (2020). An Overview of Online Alternative Finance. Public Policy Review. Policy Research Institute. Ministry of Finace, Japan. 16(4):1-19.
  21. Griffith-Jones, S. and Ocampo, J. A. (2009). The Financial Crisis and Its Impact on Developing Countries. Working Paper. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG), Brasilia.
  22. Hollas, J. (2013). Is Crowdfunding now a Threat to Traditional Finance? Corporate Finance Review.18(1):17-22.
  23. IPF Research (2016). Real Estate Crowdfunding: Gimmick or Game Changer? IPF Research, London.
  24. Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2015). Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers in Kickstarter. UNC Kenan-Flagler Research Paper (2013-15).
  25. Lehner, O. M. (2013). Crowdfunding Social Ventures: A Model and Research Agenda. An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Research. 15(4):289-311.
  26. Milton, C. (2010). Real Estate Development: The Future of Funding. BLP Law. Available at: www.blplaw.com/media/pdfs/Real_Estate_Development_Report The_future_of_funding.pdf (accessed December 5, 2017).
  27. Mollick, E. (2014). The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Venturing. 29(1), 1-16.
  28. Montgomery, N., Squires, G. and Syed, I. (2018). Disruptive Potential of Real Estate Crowdfunding in the Real Estate Project Finance Industry. Property Management. 36(5):597-619.
  29. Ogbenjuwa, L., Egbu, C. and Robinson H. (2018). A Strategic Approach to Real Estate Financing: Challenges and Opportunities in Real Estate Financing in Nigeria. RICS COBRA Conference. London. 23-24 April, 2018.
  30. Ogundu, P. G. (2025). Decenttralized Housing Finance Models: Blockchain-Based Mortgage Systems and Crowdfunded Real Estate Investment for Affordability. International Research Journal of Modernisation in Engineering Technology and Science. 7(2):9161934.
  31. Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M. and Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowd-funding: Transforming Customers into Investors through Innovative Service Platforms. Journal of Service Management. 22(4), 443-470.
  32. Patch of Land (2018). Patch of Land Loan Performance – Statistics and Trends. Available at: https://patchofland.com/statistics (accessed June 10, 2018).
  33. Rentech Digital. (2024). Real Estate Development and Emerging Crowdfunding Trends. Rentech Digital Reports.
  34. Schweizer, D. and Zhou, T. (2016). Do Principles Pay in Real EstateCrowdfunding? Working Paper. Concordia University. Montreal. Available at: www.researchgate.net/publication/309763278_Do_Principles_Pay_in_Real_Estate_Crowdfunding (accessed August 10, 2018).
  35. Stemler, A. R. (2013). The JOBS Act and crowdfunding: Harnessing the power and money of the masses. Business Horizons. 56(3):271-275
  36. Thaker, M. A. M. T., Mohammed, M. O., Duasa, J. and Abdullah, M. A. (2016). The Behavioural Intention of Micro enterprises to Use the integrated cash waqf micro enterprise investment (ICWME-I) model as a source of Financing. Gadjah Mada International of Business. 18(2):111-130
  37. UBS Global Real Estate Bubble Index. (2021). The UBS Global Real Estate Bubble Index.
  38. Walthoff-Borm, X.,Schwienbacher, A. and Vanacker, T. (2018). Equity Crowdfunding: First Resort or Last Resort? Journal of Business Venturing. 33(4):513-533.
  39. Yasar, B. (2021). The New Investment Landscape: Equity Crowdfunding. Central Bank Review. 21(1): 1-16.
How to Cite

NWOSU, A. E., THOMAS, O. J., & JACOB, O. E. (2026). EVALUATION OF ADOPTION OF CROWDFUNDING PLATFORMS FOR REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT IN AKURE, NIGERIA. Kaduna State University Environmental Sciences Journal, 6(1), 136-155. https://doi.org/10.66884/kesj.2026.yw6140bm

A. E. NWOSU, O. J. THOMAS, and O. E. JACOB, "EVALUATION OF ADOPTION OF CROWDFUNDING PLATFORMS FOR REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT IN AKURE, NIGERIA," Kaduna State University Environmental Sciences Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 136-155, May 2026. doi: 10.66884/kesj.2026.yw6140bm

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn