Research Article

SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE WITH FLY ASH AND CALCIUM CARBIDE WASTE: BINDER CHEMISTRY, WORKABILITY, AND STRENGTH

Mohammad Abba Usman1*, Umar Danazumi Yusuf1, Yahaya Bahago2
1 Federal polytechnic Nasarawa
2 Nuhu Bamalli Polytechnic Zaria
* Corresponding author: aminuabba15@fpn.edu.ng
Published: Nov, 2026
Pages: 79-89
Views: 8
Downloads: 1

Abstract

The incorporation of industrial by-products into cementitious materials can reduce Portland cement consumption and improve resource efficiency. This study investigated fly ash (FA) and calcium carbide waste (CCW) as partial replacements for Portland cement (PC) in self-compacting concrete (SCC). Eleven mixtures were produced, comprising a control and two replacement series with 5–25% FA or CCW. X-ray fluorescence (XRF), fresh-state properties (slump flow and L-box ratio), compressive strength at 14, 28 and 56 days, and tensile strength at 28 and 56 days were evaluated.XRF analysis showed that FA contained 59.04% SiO₂, 34.08% Al₂O₃ and 95.12% combined SiO₂ + Al₂O₃ + Fe₂O₃, indicating substantial pozzolanic potential, whereas CCW contained 64.00% CaO but only 3.36% combined reactive oxides. Increasing FA replacement improved fresh-state performance, with slump flow increasing from 690 to 770 mm and L-box ratio from 0.92 to 1.00 between 5 and 25% replacement. Conversely, CCW reduced slump flow from 680 to 640 mm and L-box ratio from 0.90 to 0.80. Replacement mixtures exhibited delayed early-age strength development but substantial later-age recovery, particularly with FA. At 56 days, PC–FA5 and PC–FA10 achieved 44.0 MPa compressive strength compared with 40.0 MPa for the control. The highest tensile strength was 8.54 MPa at 15% FA, while 25% CCW achieved 7.73 MPa at 56 days. Overall, FA provided the best balance of workability and later-age strength, whereas CCW exhibited poorer fresh-state behaviour at higher replacement levels.

Keywords

Self-Compacting Concrete; Fly Ash; Calcium Carbide Waste; XRF; Slump Flow; L-Box; Compressive Strength; Tensile Strength; Supplementary Cementitious Materials; Sustainable Concrete.

References

  1. ASTM International. C311/C311M-22. Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Fly Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use in Portland-Cement Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  2. ASTM International. C39/C39M-23. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. The ASTM standard specifies determination of compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens and emphasizes that results depend on specimen characteristics, batching, molding, curing and testing conditions.
  3. ASTM International. C496/C496M-17. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  4. ASTM International. C618. Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. The specification establishes chemical and physical requirements for qualifying fly ash and natural pozzolans.
  5. Bawab, J., El-Hassan, H., El-Dieb, A., Khatib, J., & El-Mir, A. (2025). Utilization of calcium carbide residue as a concrete component: A comprehensive review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 22, e04823. doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04823. This review synthesizes 51 studies and highlights the importance of preprocessing, dosage and interaction with supplementary cementitious materials.
  6. EFNARC. (2002). Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete. European Federation for Specialist Construction Chemicals and Concrete Systems. Farnham, UK. ISBN: 0-9539733-4-4.
  7. European Project Group. (2005). The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete: Specification, Production and Use. EFNARC/ERMCO/CEMBUREAU/EFCA/BIBM. The guidelines define SCC filling ability, passing ability, segregation resistance and slump-flow classifications.
  8. Feys, D., Verhoeven, R., & De Schutter, G. (2008). Fresh self compacting concrete, a shear thickening material. Cement and Concrete Research, 38(7), 920–929. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.02.008.
  9. Fraay, A. L. A., Bijen, J. M., & de Haan, Y. M. (1989). The reaction of fly ash in concrete: A critical examination. Cement and Concrete Research, 19(2), 235–246. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(89)90088-4.
  10. Gnanaraj, S. Christopher, Chokkalingam, Ramesh Babu, Thankam, G. Lizia, & Pothinathan, S. K. M. (2021). Influence of steatite and fly ash on the fresh-hardened properties and micromorphology of self-compacting concrete. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 6627450. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6627450
  11. Jain, Ankit, Kumar, Sanjay, Kumar, Rakesh, & others. (2021). Enhancement of self-compactability of fresh self-compacting concrete: A review. Cleaner Materials, 1, 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2021.100019.
  12. Mohammad Abba Usman1, Yusuf Danazumi Umar2 and Yahaya Bahago3
  13. 89
  14. Kaduna Environmental Science Journal (KESJ), Vol. 6, Iss..2, December 2026
  15. Juenger, M. C. G., Snellings, R., & Bernal, S. A. (2019). Supplementary cementitious materials: New sources, characterization, and performance insights. Cement and Concrete Research, 122, 257–273. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.05.008.
  16. Mahmmod, Laith Mohammed Ridha, & Abbas, Waleed A. (2026). Calcium carbide residue: A comprehensive review of past and future progress and potential prospects in eco-friendly cementitious binders. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2025.2606920
  17. Makaratat, Nattapong, Jaturapitakkul, Chai, & Laosamathikul, Thanapol. (2010). Effects of calcium carbide residue–fly ash binder on mechanical properties of concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 22(11), 1164–1170. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000127
  18. Nayak, D. K., Abhilash, P. P., Singh, R., Kumar, R., & Kumar, V. (2022). Fly ash for sustainable construction: A review of fly ash concrete and its beneficial use case studies. Cleaner Materials, 6, 100143. doi:10.1016/j.clema.2022.100143.
  19. Okamura, H., & Ouchi, M. (2003). Self-compacting concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 1(1), 5–15. doi:10.3151/jact.1.5.
  20. Paris, J. M., Roessler, J. G., Ferraro, C. C., DeFord, H. D., & Townsend, T. G. (2016). A review of waste products utilized as supplements to Portland cement in concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.013.
  21. Singh, Navdeep, Kumar, Pawan, & Goyal, Paresh. (2019). Reviewing the behaviour of high volume fly ash based self compacting concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 26, 100882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100882
  22. Sun, H., Li, Z., Bai, J., Memon, S. A., Dong, B., Fang, Y., Xu, W., & Xing, F. (2015). Properties of chemically combusted calcium carbide residue and its influence on cement properties. Materials, 8(2), 638–651. doi:10.3390/ma8020638.
  23. Xu, G., Li, Z., & Shi, X. (2021). Reactivity of coal fly ash used in cementitious binder systems: A state-of-the-art overview. Fuel, 301, 121031. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121031.
How to Cite

Usman, M. A., Yusuf, U. D., & Bahago, Y. (2026). SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE WITH FLY ASH AND CALCIUM CARBIDE WASTE: BINDER CHEMISTRY, WORKABILITY, AND STRENGTH. Kaduna State University Environmental Sciences Journal, 6(2), 79-89.

M. A. Usman, U. D. Yusuf, and Y. Bahago, "SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE WITH FLY ASH AND CALCIUM CARBIDE WASTE: BINDER CHEMISTRY, WORKABILITY, AND STRENGTH," Kaduna State University Environmental Sciences Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 79-89, November 2026.

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF View Full Text (PDF) Back to Articles